਍㰀猀琀礀氀攀 琀礀瀀攀㴀∀琀攀砀琀⼀挀猀猀∀㸀ഀഀ .BODY { background-color: #EAF1F7; background-image: url('images/gtbh.jpg'); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-attachment: fixed; background-position: center; color: #0066CC;} ਍⸀䌀㄀笀琀攀砀琀ⴀ愀氀椀最渀㨀 樀甀猀琀椀昀礀㬀挀漀氀漀爀㨀 ⌀  㘀㘀䌀䌀㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ猀椀稀攀㨀 匀䴀䄀䰀䰀㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ昀愀洀椀氀礀㨀 吀愀栀漀洀愀㬀紀ഀഀ .BIB{text-align: center;color: #000099;FONT-size: SMALL;FONT-family: Tahoma;} ਍⸀䌀伀一吀笀琀攀砀琀ⴀ愀氀椀最渀㨀 爀椀最栀琀㬀挀漀氀漀爀㨀 ⌀䘀䘀    㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ猀椀稀攀㨀 匀䴀䄀䰀䰀㬀䘀伀一吀ⴀ昀愀洀椀氀礀㨀 吀愀栀漀洀愀㬀紀ഀഀ ਍㰀䴀䔀吀䄀 栀琀琀瀀ⴀ攀焀甀椀瘀㴀∀挀漀渀琀攀渀琀ⴀ琀礀瀀攀∀ 挀漀渀琀攀渀琀㴀∀琀攀砀琀⼀栀琀洀氀㬀 挀栀愀爀猀攀琀㴀唀吀䘀ⴀ㠀∀㸀㰀⼀䠀䔀䄀䐀㸀ഀഀ ਍㰀䘀伀一吀 䄀䰀䤀䜀一㴀∀䨀唀匀吀䤀䘀夀∀ 䘀䄀䌀䔀㴀∀吀愀栀漀洀愀∀㸀ഀഀ

VĪR SIṄGH, BHĀĪ (1872-1957), poet, scholar and exegete, was a major figure in the Sikh renaissance and in the movement for the revival and renewal of Punjabi literary traditioin. His identification with all the important concerns of modern Sikhism was so complete that he came to be canonized as Bhāī, the Brother of the Sikh Order, very early in his career. For his pioneering work in its several different genres, he is acknowledged as the creator of modern Punjabi literature.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀ऀ䈀漀爀渀 漀渀 㔀 䐀攀挀攀洀戀攀爀 ㄀㠀㜀㈀Ⰰ 椀渀 䄀洀爀椀琀猀愀爀Ⰰ 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 眀愀猀 琀栀攀 攀氀搀攀猀琀 漀昀 䐀爀 䌀栀愀爀愀渀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀✀猀 琀栀爀攀攀 猀漀渀猀⸀ 吀栀攀 昀愀洀椀氀礀 琀爀愀挀攀猀 椀琀猀 愀渀挀攀猀琀爀礀 戀愀挀欀 琀漀 䐀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀眀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀渀 䬀愀甀☀⌀㜀㜀㜀㄀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 䴀愀氀氀 ⠀搀⸀ ㄀㜀㔀㈀⤀Ⰰ 眀栀漀 爀漀猀攀 琀漀 琀栀攀 瀀漀猀椀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 瘀椀挀攀ⴀ最漀瘀攀爀渀漀爀 漀昀 䴀甀氀琀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀渀Ⰰ 甀渀搀攀爀 一愀眀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀戀 䴀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 䴀甀☀⌀㠀㈀㄀㜀椀渀 甀氀ⴀ䴀甀氀欀Ⰰ 眀椀琀栀 琀栀攀 琀椀琀氀攀 漀昀 䴀愀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀樀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 䈀愀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀搀甀爀 䈀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀戀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 䬀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀栀渀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 ⠀㄀㜀㠀㠀ⴀ㄀㠀㜀㠀⤀ 眀愀猀 瀀攀爀栀愀瀀猀 琀栀攀 昀椀爀猀琀 椀渀 琀栀攀 昀愀洀椀氀礀 琀漀 戀攀 爀攀最甀氀愀爀氀礀 猀眀漀爀渀 愀 匀椀欀栀⸀ 䠀攀 琀甀爀渀攀搀 愀 爀攀挀氀甀猀攀 眀栀攀渀 栀攀 眀愀猀 猀琀椀氀氀 椀渀 栀椀猀 攀愀爀氀礀 琀攀攀渀猀 愀渀搀 猀瀀攀渀琀 栀椀猀 攀渀琀椀爀攀 礀漀甀琀栀 椀渀 洀漀渀愀猀琀攀爀椀攀猀 愀琀 䠀愀爀椀搀瘀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀爀 愀渀搀 䄀洀爀椀琀猀愀爀 愀挀焀甀椀爀椀渀最 琀爀愀椀渀椀渀最 椀渀 琀爀愀搀椀琀椀漀渀愀氀 匀椀欀栀 氀攀愀爀渀椀渀最⸀ 䠀椀猀 洀漀琀栀攀爀✀猀 愀昀昀攀挀琀椀漀渀 甀氀琀椀洀愀琀攀氀礀 爀攀挀氀愀椀洀攀搀 栀椀洀 琀漀 琀栀攀 氀椀昀攀 漀昀 愀 栀漀甀猀攀栀漀氀搀攀爀 愀琀 琀栀攀 愀最攀 漀昀 㐀 Ⰰ 眀栀攀渀 栀攀 最漀琀 洀愀爀爀椀攀搀⸀ 䄀搀攀瀀琀 椀渀 瘀攀爀猀椀昀椀挀愀琀椀漀渀 椀渀 匀愀渀猀欀爀椀琀 愀渀搀 䈀爀愀樀 愀猀 眀攀氀氀 愀猀 椀渀 琀栀攀 漀爀椀攀渀琀愀氀 猀礀猀琀攀洀 漀昀 洀攀搀椀挀椀渀攀Ⰰ 䈀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀戀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 䬀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀栀渀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 瀀愀猀猀攀搀 漀渀 栀椀猀 椀渀琀攀爀攀猀琀猀 琀漀 栀椀猀 漀渀氀礀 猀漀渀Ⰰ 䐀爀 䌀栀愀爀愀渀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀⸀ 䄀瀀愀爀琀 昀爀漀洀 栀椀猀 猀甀猀琀愀椀渀攀搀 椀渀瘀漀氀瘀攀洀攀渀琀 椀渀 氀椀琀攀爀愀爀礀 愀渀搀 猀挀栀漀氀愀爀氀礀 瀀甀爀猀甀椀琀猀Ⰰ 洀愀椀渀氀礀 愀猀 愀 䈀爀愀樀 瀀漀攀琀Ⰰ 倀甀渀樀愀戀椀 瀀爀漀猀攀 眀爀椀琀攀爀Ⰰ 洀甀猀椀挀漀氀漀最椀猀琀Ⰰ 瀀爀漀猀漀搀椀猀琀 愀渀搀 氀攀砀椀挀漀最爀愀瀀栀攀爀Ⰰ 䐀爀 䌀栀愀爀愀渀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 琀漀漀欀 愀挀琀椀瘀攀 椀渀琀攀爀攀猀琀 椀渀 琀栀攀 愀昀昀愀椀爀猀 漀昀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀 挀漀洀洀甀渀椀琀礀Ⰰ 琀栀攀渀 攀砀瀀攀爀椀攀渀挀椀渀最 愀 渀攀眀 甀爀最攀 昀漀爀 爀攀猀琀漀爀愀琀椀漀渀 愀猀 眀攀氀氀 愀猀 昀漀爀 挀栀愀渀最攀⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ

        To this patrimony of Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh was added from his mother's side a living kinship with another rich tradition of scholarship in exegesis of the Giānī school, going back to the times of Gurū Gobind Siṅgh. His maternal grandfather Giānī Hazārā Siṅgh compiled a lexicon of Gurū Granth Sāhib, and wrote a commentary on Bhāī Gurdās' Varāṅ. As a schoolboy, Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh used to spend a great deal of his time in the company of Giānī Hazārā Siṅgh under whose guidance he not only learnt the classical and neo-classical languages, Sanskrit, Persian and Braj, but also received grounding, both theoretical and practical, in the science of Sikh exegesis.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 眀愀猀 琀栀攀 挀栀椀氀搀 漀昀 愀渀 愀最攀 椀渀 昀攀爀洀攀渀琀⸀ 吀栀攀 攀砀琀椀渀挀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 匀椀欀栀 猀漀瘀攀爀攀椀最渀琀礀 椀渀 琀栀攀 倀甀渀樀愀戀Ⰰ 琀栀攀 搀攀挀氀椀渀攀 椀渀 琀栀攀 昀漀爀琀甀渀攀猀 漀昀 匀椀欀栀 愀爀椀猀琀漀挀爀愀挀礀Ⰰ 琀栀攀 最爀愀搀甀愀氀 攀洀攀爀最攀渀挀攀 漀昀 甀爀戀愀渀 洀椀搀搀氀攀 挀氀愀猀猀攀猀Ⰰ 琀栀攀 搀椀猀猀椀瀀愀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 ∀渀愀琀椀漀渀愀氀 椀渀琀攀氀氀攀挀琀甀愀氀 氀椀昀攀∀ 漀昀 琀栀攀 倀甀渀樀愀戀 漀眀椀渀最 琀漀 琀栀攀 渀攀最氀攀挀琀 愀渀搀 搀攀挀愀礀 漀昀 椀渀搀椀最攀渀漀甀猀 攀搀甀挀愀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 氀漀挀愀氀 瀀攀漀瀀氀攀 昀爀漀洀 琀栀攀椀爀 瀀漀氀椀琀椀挀愀氀 搀攀猀琀椀渀礀 愀爀漀甀猀攀搀 愀洀漀渀最 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀猀 挀漀渀挀攀爀渀 昀漀爀 猀甀爀瘀椀瘀愀氀 愀渀搀 昀漀爀 爀攀搀攀昀椀渀椀渀最 琀栀攀 戀漀甀渀搀愀爀椀攀猀 漀昀 琀栀攀椀爀 昀愀椀琀栀⸀ 䘀甀爀琀栀攀爀 挀栀愀氀氀攀渀最攀猀 愀爀漀猀攀 椀渀 琀栀攀 猀栀愀瀀攀 漀昀 洀漀搀攀爀渀椀稀愀琀椀漀渀Ⰰ 漀昀 䌀栀爀椀猀琀椀愀渀Ⰰ 䴀甀猀氀椀洀 愀渀搀 䠀椀渀搀甀 洀漀瘀攀洀攀渀琀猀 漀昀 瀀爀漀猀攀氀礀琀椀稀愀琀椀漀渀 愀渀搀 琀栀攀 愀最渀漀猀琀椀挀 挀甀氀琀猀 猀甀挀栀 愀猀 䈀爀愀栀洀漀 匀愀洀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀樀⸀ 倀愀爀愀氀氀攀氀 琀漀 琀栀攀 搀攀瘀攀氀漀瀀洀攀渀琀猀 昀漀爀攀戀漀搀椀渀最 最爀愀搀甀愀氀 愀瀀瀀爀漀瀀爀椀愀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 匀椀欀栀椀猀洀 戀礀 琀栀攀 䠀椀渀搀甀 猀漀挀椀愀氀 漀爀搀攀爀 攀洀攀爀最攀搀 愀 瀀漀眀攀爀昀甀氀 琀爀攀渀搀 琀漀眀愀爀搀猀 䈀爀愀樀 挀氀愀猀猀椀挀椀猀洀 椀渀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀 氀椀琀攀爀愀爀礀 愀渀搀 猀挀栀漀氀愀爀氀礀 琀爀愀搀椀琀椀漀渀⸀ 䴀礀琀栀漀氀漀最椀稀愀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 瀀攀爀猀漀渀猀 漀昀 匀椀欀栀 䜀甀爀☀⌀㌀㘀㌀猀Ⰰ 洀椀砀椀渀最 漀昀 昀椀挀琀椀漀渀 眀椀琀栀 栀椀猀琀漀爀椀挀愀氀 昀愀挀琀 愀渀搀 椀渀琀攀爀眀攀愀瘀椀渀最 漀昀 嘀攀搀愀渀琀椀挀 愀渀搀 嘀愀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㜀㤀☀⌀㜀㜀㔀㄀愀瘀椀琀攀 洀漀琀椀昀猀 椀渀琀漀 琀栀攀 攀猀猀攀渀琀椀愀氀 匀椀欀栀 琀攀愀挀栀椀渀最 眀攀爀攀 椀琀猀 琀礀瀀椀挀愀氀 昀攀愀琀甀爀攀猀⸀ 䤀渀 爀攀猀瀀漀渀猀攀 愀爀漀猀攀 椀渀 匀椀欀栀椀猀洀 猀攀瘀攀爀愀氀 洀漀瘀攀洀攀渀琀猀 ⴀⴀⴀ一椀爀愀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀欀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀爀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 ⠀瀀甀爀椀琀愀渀椀猀洀⤀Ⰰ 一☀⌀㈀㔀㜀洀搀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀爀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 ⠀洀椀氀椀琀愀渀琀 瀀爀漀琀攀猀琀愀渀琀椀猀洀⤀Ⰰ 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 匀愀戀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 ⠀爀攀瘀椀瘀愀氀椀猀洀 愀渀搀 爀攀渀愀椀猀猀愀渀挀攀⤀ 愀渀搀 倀愀挀栀 㰀甀㸀䬀栀㰀⼀甀㸀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀氀猀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 䐀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀眀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀渀 ⠀愀最最爀攀猀猀椀瘀攀 昀甀渀搀愀洀攀渀琀愀氀椀猀洀⤀⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ

        Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh had the benefit of both the traditional indigenous learning as well as of modern English education. He learnt Persian and Urdu from a Muslim Maulawī in a mosque and was apprenticed to Giānī Harbhajan Siṅgh, a leading classical scholar, for Sanskrit and Sikh literature. He then joined the Church Mission School, Amritsar, and took his matriculation examination in 1891. At school, the conversion of some of the students proved a crucial experience which strengthened his own religious conviction. From the Christian missionaries' emphasis on literary resources, he learnt how efficacious the written word could be as a means of informing and influencing a person's innermost being. Through his English courses, he acquired familiarity with modern literary forms, especially short lyric. While still at school, Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh was married at the age of 17 to Chatar Kaur, daughter of Sardār Naraiṇ Siṅgh of Amritsar.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀唀渀氀椀欀攀 琀栀攀 攀搀甀挀愀琀攀搀 礀漀甀渀最 洀攀渀 漀昀 栀椀猀 琀椀洀攀Ⰰ 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 眀愀猀 渀漀琀 琀攀洀瀀琀攀搀 戀礀 瀀爀漀猀瀀攀挀琀 漀昀 愀 挀愀爀攀攀爀 椀渀 最漀瘀攀爀渀洀攀渀琀 猀攀爀瘀椀挀攀⸀ 䠀攀 挀栀漀猀攀 昀漀爀 栀椀洀猀攀氀昀 琀栀攀 挀愀氀氀椀渀最 漀昀 愀 眀爀椀琀攀爀 愀渀搀 挀爀攀愀琀攀搀 洀愀琀攀爀椀愀氀 挀漀渀搀椀琀椀漀渀猀 昀漀爀 愀 猀椀渀最氀攀ⴀ洀椀渀搀攀搀 瀀甀爀猀甀椀琀 漀昀 椀琀⸀ 䄀渀 礀攀愀爀 愀昀琀攀爀 栀椀猀 瀀愀猀猀椀渀最 琀栀攀 洀愀琀爀椀挀甀氀愀琀椀漀渀 攀砀愀洀椀渀愀琀椀漀渀Ⰰ 栀攀 猀攀琀 甀瀀 愀 氀椀琀栀漀最爀愀瀀栀 瀀爀攀猀猀 椀渀 挀漀氀氀愀戀漀爀愀琀椀漀渀 眀椀琀栀 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 圀愀稀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀Ⰰ 愀 昀爀椀攀渀搀 漀昀 栀椀猀 昀愀琀栀攀爀✀猀⸀ 䄀猀 栀椀猀 昀椀爀猀琀 攀猀猀愀礀猀 椀渀 琀栀攀 氀椀琀攀爀愀爀礀 昀椀攀氀搀Ⰰ 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 挀漀洀瀀漀猀攀搀 猀漀洀攀 䜀攀漀最爀愀瀀栀礀 琀攀砀琀戀漀漀欀猀 昀漀爀 猀挀栀漀漀氀猀⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ

        Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh began taking active interest in the affairs of Siṅgh Sabhā movement. To promote its aims and objects, he launched in 1894 the Khālsā Tract Society. In November 1899, he started a Punjabi weekly, the Khālsā Samāchār. He was among the principal promoters of several of the Sikh institutions, such as Chief Khālsā Dīwān (1902), Sikh Educational Society (1908) and the Punjab and Sind Bank (1908). Interest in corporate activity directed towards community development remained Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh's constant concern, simultaneously with his creative and scholarly pursuits. In this engagement and, at the same time, in his eschewal of political activity, the Christian missionary example was apparently his model.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀䤀渀 搀攀琀攀爀洀椀渀椀渀最 琀栀攀 戀愀猀椀挀 瀀愀爀愀洀攀琀攀爀猀 漀昀 琀栀攀 洀漀搀攀爀渀 瀀栀愀猀攀 漀昀 匀椀欀栀椀猀洀Ⰰ 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 猀琀爀攀猀猀攀搀 琀栀攀 愀甀琀漀渀漀洀礀 漀昀 匀椀欀栀 昀愀椀琀栀 渀漀甀爀椀猀栀攀搀 愀渀搀 猀甀猀琀愀椀渀攀搀 戀礀 愀渀 愀眀愀欀攀渀椀渀最 愀洀漀渀最猀琀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀猀 漀昀 琀栀攀 愀眀愀爀攀渀攀猀猀 漀昀 琀栀攀椀爀 搀椀猀琀椀渀挀琀 琀栀攀漀氀漀最椀挀愀氀 愀渀搀 挀甀氀琀甀爀愀氀 椀搀攀渀琀椀琀礀⸀ 匀攀挀漀渀搀氀礀Ⰰ 栀攀 愀椀洀攀搀 愀琀 爀攀漀爀椀攀渀琀椀渀最 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀猀✀ 甀渀搀攀爀猀琀愀渀搀椀渀最 漀昀 琀栀攀椀爀 昀愀椀琀栀 椀渀 猀甀挀栀 愀 洀愀渀渀攀爀 愀猀 琀漀 栀攀氀瀀 琀栀攀洀 愀猀猀椀洀椀氀愀琀攀 琀栀攀 搀椀昀昀攀爀攀渀琀 洀漀搀攀爀渀椀稀椀渀最 椀渀昀氀甀攀渀挀攀猀 琀漀 琀栀攀椀爀 栀椀猀琀漀爀椀挀愀氀 洀攀洀漀爀礀 愀渀搀 挀甀氀琀甀爀愀氀 栀攀爀椀琀愀最攀⸀ 䔀搀甀挀愀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 洀愀猀猀攀猀 眀愀猀 琀栀攀 昀椀爀猀琀 爀攀焀甀椀爀攀洀攀渀琀 昀漀爀 琀栀攀 昀甀氀昀椀氀洀攀渀琀 漀昀 琀栀攀猀攀 漀戀樀攀挀琀椀瘀攀猀⸀ 䤀渀 琀栀攀 洀攀愀渀眀栀椀氀攀Ⰰ 琀栀攀 漀氀搀 攀搀甀挀愀琀椀漀渀愀氀 猀礀猀琀攀洀 眀栀椀挀栀 栀愀搀 琀椀氀氀 琀栀攀渀 猀攀爀瘀攀搀 愀猀 愀 挀栀愀渀渀攀氀 昀漀爀 挀漀洀洀甀渀椀挀愀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 琀爀愀搀椀琀椀漀渀愀氀 欀渀漀眀氀攀搀最攀 琀漀 琀栀攀 礀漀甀琀栀 漀昀 琀栀攀 爀愀挀攀 栀愀搀 戀爀漀欀攀渀 搀漀眀渀 眀椀琀栀 琀栀攀 眀椀琀栀搀爀愀眀愀氀Ⰰ 甀渀搀攀爀 䈀爀椀琀椀猀栀 搀椀猀瀀攀渀猀愀琀椀漀渀Ⰰ 漀昀 猀琀愀琀攀 瀀愀琀爀漀渀愀最攀 昀爀漀洀 琀栀攀 椀渀搀椀最攀渀漀甀猀 椀渀猀琀椀琀甀琀椀漀渀猀⸀ 䄀猀 椀昀 琀漀 昀椀氀氀 琀栀攀 瘀愀挀甀甀洀 愀猀 眀攀氀氀 愀猀 琀漀 戀甀椀氀搀 渀攀眀 挀栀愀渀渀攀氀猀 漀昀 椀渀琀爀愀ⴀ挀漀洀洀甀渀椀琀礀 挀漀洀洀甀渀椀挀愀琀椀漀渀Ⰰ 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 琀栀爀漀甀最栀 栀椀猀 猀椀渀最氀攀ⴀ洀椀渀搀攀搀 挀甀氀琀椀瘀愀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 倀甀渀樀愀戀椀 氀愀渀最甀愀最攀 愀猀 琀栀攀 洀攀搀椀甀洀 漀昀 栀椀猀 琀栀攀漀氀漀最椀挀愀氀Ⰰ 猀挀栀漀氀愀爀氀礀 愀渀搀 挀爀攀愀琀椀瘀攀 眀漀爀欀Ⰰ 爀攀猀漀氀瘀攀搀 琀栀攀 挀甀氀琀甀爀愀氀 搀椀氀攀洀洀愀 眀栀椀挀栀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀猀 昀愀挀攀搀 愀琀 琀栀攀 琀甀爀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 挀攀渀琀甀爀礀⸀ 伀渀 琀栀攀 漀渀攀 栀愀渀搀 眀愀猀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀 氀椀琀攀爀愀爀礀 琀爀愀搀椀琀椀漀渀 椀渀 䈀爀愀樀 氀愀渀最甀愀最攀 眀栀椀挀栀 栀愀搀 挀漀氀氀攀挀琀攀搀 甀渀洀愀琀挀栀攀搀 爀椀挀栀攀猀 椀渀 洀甀氀琀椀瀀氀攀 搀椀爀攀挀琀椀漀渀猀 搀甀爀椀渀最 琀栀攀 挀漀甀爀猀攀 漀昀 椀琀猀 琀栀爀攀攀ⴀ挀攀渀琀甀爀椀攀猀ⴀ氀漀渀最 攀氀椀琀椀猀琀 挀愀爀攀攀爀Ⰰ 漀渀 琀栀攀 漀琀栀攀爀 眀攀爀攀 琀栀攀 挀漀洀瀀甀氀猀椀漀渀猀 昀漀爀 洀漀戀椀氀椀稀椀渀最 琀栀攀 挀漀洀洀漀渀 匀椀欀栀猀 琀栀爀漀甀最栀 琀栀攀椀爀 漀眀渀 氀愀渀最甀愀最攀⸀ 䈀礀 搀爀愀眀椀渀最 甀瀀漀渀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀 琀爀愀搀椀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 䈀爀愀樀 氀椀琀攀爀愀琀甀爀攀 昀漀爀 栀椀猀 戀愀猀椀挀 椀渀猀瀀椀爀愀琀椀漀渀 愀渀搀 挀甀氀琀甀爀愀氀 洀漀琀椀瘀愀琀椀漀渀 愀渀搀 甀瀀漀渀 琀栀攀 倀甀渀樀愀戀椀 氀椀琀攀爀愀爀礀 琀爀愀搀椀琀椀漀渀 昀漀爀 椀琀猀 氀椀渀最甀椀猀琀椀挀 挀漀洀瀀漀渀攀渀琀Ⰰ 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 椀渀椀琀椀愀琀攀搀 愀 渀攀眀 氀椀琀攀爀愀爀礀 椀搀椀漀洀 搀椀猀琀椀渀挀琀氀礀 搀椀昀昀攀爀攀渀琀 昀爀漀洀 戀漀琀栀⸀ 吀栀攀 琀爀愀挀琀猀 瀀爀漀搀甀挀攀搀 戀礀 琀栀攀 㰀甀㸀䬀栀㰀⼀甀㸀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀氀猀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 吀爀愀挀琀 匀漀挀椀攀琀礀 椀渀琀爀漀搀甀挀攀搀 愀 搀漀眀渀ⴀ琀漀ⴀ攀愀爀琀栀 氀椀琀攀爀愀爀礀 倀甀渀樀愀戀椀 爀攀洀愀爀欀愀戀氀攀 昀漀爀 氀椀最栀琀渀攀猀猀 漀昀 琀漀甀挀栀 愀猀 眀攀氀氀 愀猀 昀漀爀 昀爀攀猀栀渀攀猀猀 漀昀 攀砀瀀爀攀猀猀椀漀渀⸀ 䤀渀 琀栀椀猀 眀爀椀琀椀渀最 氀愀礀 琀栀攀 戀攀最椀渀渀椀渀最猀 漀昀 洀漀搀攀爀渀 倀甀渀樀愀戀椀 瀀爀漀猀攀⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ

        The Khālsā Tract Society periodically made available under the title Nirguṇiārā low-cost publications on Sikh theology, history and philosophy and on social and religious reform. Through this journal Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh established a living contact with an ever-expanding circle of readers. He used the Nirguṇiārā as a vehicle for his own self-expression and some of his major creative works such as the epic Rāṇā Sūrat Siṅgh, the novel Bābā Naudh Siṅgh, and the lives of the Gurūs Srī Gurū Nānak Chamatkār and Srī Gurū Kalgīdhar Chamatkār were originally serialized in its columns.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀䤀渀 氀椀琀攀爀愀琀甀爀攀Ⰰ 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 猀琀愀爀琀攀搀 愀猀 愀 眀爀椀琀攀爀 漀昀 爀漀洀愀渀挀攀猀 眀栀椀挀栀 瀀爀漀瘀攀搀 琀漀 戀攀 琀栀攀 昀漀爀攀爀甀渀渀攀爀猀 漀昀 琀栀攀 倀甀渀樀愀戀椀 渀漀瘀攀氀⸀ 䠀椀猀 眀爀椀琀椀渀最猀 椀渀 琀栀椀猀 最攀渀爀攀ⴀⴀⴀ㰀椀㸀匀甀渀搀愀爀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀㰀⼀椀㸀 ⠀㄀㠀㤀㠀⤀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀䈀椀樀愀礀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀㰀⼀椀㸀 ⠀㄀㠀㤀㤀⤀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀匀愀琀瘀愀渀琀 䬀愀甀爀㰀⼀椀㸀 ⠀瀀甀戀氀椀猀栀攀搀 椀渀 琀眀漀 瀀愀爀琀猀Ⰰ 䤀 椀渀 ㄀㤀   愀渀搀 䤀䤀Ⰰ 椀渀 ㄀㤀㈀㜀⤀ⴀⴀⴀ眀攀爀攀 愀椀洀攀搀 愀琀 爀攀挀爀攀愀琀椀渀最 琀栀攀 栀攀爀漀椀挀 瀀攀爀椀漀搀 ⠀攀椀最栀琀攀攀渀琀栀 挀攀渀琀甀爀礀⤀ 漀昀 匀椀欀栀 栀椀猀琀漀爀礀⸀ 吀栀爀漀甀最栀 琀栀攀猀攀 渀漀瘀攀氀猀 栀攀 洀愀搀攀 愀瘀愀椀氀愀戀氀攀 琀漀 栀椀猀 爀攀愀搀攀爀猀 琀礀瀀椀挀愀氀 洀漀搀攀氀猀 漀昀 挀漀甀爀愀最攀Ⰰ 昀漀爀琀椀琀甀搀攀 愀渀搀 栀甀洀愀渀 搀椀最渀椀琀礀⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ

        Subhāg jī dā Sudhār Hathīṅ Bābā Naud Siṅgh, popularly known as Bābā Naudh Siṅgh (serialized in Nirguṇiārā from 1907 onwards and published in book form in 1921) shares with Rāṇā Sūrat Siṅgh (which he had started serializing two years earlier), Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh's fascination with the theme of widow's desperate urge for a re-union with her dead husband. But in Bābā Naudh Siṅgh this search is situated in a more mundane setting. This makes all the difference. The narrative here is more realistic in tone, and almost contemporary in its appeal. Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh weaves into the narrative numerous motifs of social reform, moral teaching and religious preaching and depicts several situations of inter-communal and urban-rural confrontation.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀䤀渀 ㄀㤀 㔀Ⰰ 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 猀琀愀爀琀攀搀 猀攀爀椀愀氀椀稀椀渀最 琀栀爀漀甀最栀 琀爀愀挀琀猀 㰀椀㸀刀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㜀㜀㔀㄀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 匀☀⌀㌀㘀㌀爀愀琀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀㰀⼀椀㸀Ⰰ 琀栀攀 昀椀爀猀琀 倀甀渀樀愀戀椀 攀瀀椀挀Ⰰ 眀爀椀琀琀攀渀 椀渀 戀氀愀渀欀 瘀攀爀猀攀 漀昀 匀椀爀欀栀愀☀⌀㜀㜀㔀㄀☀⌀㜀㘀㤀㌀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 瘀愀爀椀攀琀礀⸀ 吀栀椀猀 氀漀渀最 渀愀爀爀愀琀椀瘀攀 漀昀 漀瘀攀爀 ㄀㐀Ⰰ    氀椀渀攀猀 椀猀 愀 猀琀爀椀欀椀渀最 椀洀愀最椀渀愀琀椀瘀攀 攀瘀漀挀愀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 猀椀琀甀愀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀猀 琀栀爀漀甀最栀 愀 猀礀洀戀漀氀椀挀 琀愀氀攀 漀昀 愀 眀椀搀漀眀攀搀 焀甀攀攀渀 椀渀 焀甀攀猀琀 漀昀 栀攀爀 氀漀猀琀 瀀愀爀愀搀椀猀攀⸀ 吀栀攀 猀瀀椀爀椀琀甀愀氀 瘀漀礀愀最攀 漀昀 刀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㜀㜀㔀㄀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 刀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀樀 䬀愀甀爀Ⰰ 琀栀攀 洀愀椀渀 瀀爀漀琀愀最漀渀椀猀琀 漀昀 琀栀攀 瀀漀攀洀Ⰰ 昀爀漀洀 攀砀琀攀爀渀愀氀 昀愀挀琀甀愀氀椀琀礀 琀漀 椀渀琀攀爀渀愀氀 攀猀猀攀渀挀攀 栀愀猀 戀攀攀渀 搀攀猀挀爀椀戀攀搀 戀礀 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 椀渀 琀栀攀 昀漀爀洀 漀昀 愀 昀愀渀琀愀猀礀 漀昀 猀瀀椀爀椀琀甀愀氀 愀猀挀攀渀猀椀漀渀⸀ 䄀瀀愀爀琀 昀爀漀洀 氀椀瘀椀渀最 漀甀琀 栀攀爀 攀愀爀琀栀氀礀 搀攀猀琀椀渀礀 漀昀 猀甀昀昀攀爀椀渀最 愀渀搀 瀀愀椀渀Ⰰ 猀栀攀 猀礀洀戀漀氀椀稀攀搀 琀栀攀 琀漀琀愀氀 攀琀栀漀猀 漀昀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀 瀀攀漀瀀氀攀 愀琀 琀栀愀琀 栀椀猀琀漀爀椀挀愀氀 洀漀洀攀渀琀 眀栀攀渀 琀栀攀礀 眀攀爀攀 攀洀攀爀最椀渀最 漀甀琀 漀昀 琀栀攀椀爀 猀攀渀猀攀 漀昀 搀攀昀攀愀琀 愀渀搀✀ 搀攀猀瀀愀椀爀 椀渀琀漀 愀渀 攀爀愀 漀昀 愀 昀爀攀猀栀 戀攀最椀渀渀椀渀最⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ

        Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh's quest for new forms of expression continued. Soon after the publication of Rāṇā Sūrat Siṅgh in book form in 1919, he turned to shorter poems and lyrics. In quick succession came Dil Taraṅg (1920), Tarel Tupke (1921), Lahirāṅ de Hār (1921), Maṭak Hulāre (1922), and Bijlīāṅ de Hār (1927). Following at some distance was Mere Sāīāṅ Jīo (1953). In this poetry, Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh's concerns were more aesthetic than didactic, metaphysical or mystical. He refined the old verse forms and created new ones. The metrical patterns Kābit, Soraṭhā, Baint, etc., which he inherited from classical Punjabi literature, were transformed into light, nimble measures. Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh also naturalized in Punjabi the Rubāī which he borrowed from Urdu. By grafting Soraṭhā and Sirkhaṇḍī forms on English blank verse, he paved the way for the emergence of Punjabi poem. As it happened, the first play written in Punjabi, Rājā Lakhdātā Siṅgh (1910), also came from the pen of Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh. Tentative in form, the play did reveal the author's powers of constructing crisp and witty dialogues.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀䌀栀愀渀最攀ⴀ漀瘀攀爀 昀爀漀洀 䈀爀愀樀 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀猀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 琀漀 倀甀渀樀愀戀椀 愀猀 琀栀攀 洀愀椀渀 洀攀搀椀甀洀 漀昀 匀椀欀栀 氀椀琀攀爀愀爀礀 愀渀搀 猀挀栀漀氀愀爀氀礀 攀砀瀀爀攀猀猀椀漀渀 挀爀攀愀琀攀搀 琀栀攀 渀攀攀搀 昀漀爀 渀攀眀 洀愀琀攀爀椀愀氀猀 猀甀挀栀 愀猀 最氀漀猀猀愀爀椀攀猀Ⰰ 氀攀砀椀挀漀渀猀Ⰰ 攀渀挀礀挀氀漀瀀愀攀搀椀愀猀 愀渀搀 攀砀攀最攀琀椀挀愀氀 眀漀爀欀猀⸀ 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 栀椀洀猀攀氀昀 瀀爀漀瘀椀搀攀搀 猀攀瘀攀爀愀氀 漀昀 琀栀攀 琀漀漀氀猀⸀ 䠀攀 爀攀瘀椀猀攀搀 愀渀搀 攀渀氀愀爀最攀搀 䜀椀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀渀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 䠀愀稀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀✀猀 搀椀挀琀椀漀渀愀爀礀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀匀爀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 䜀甀爀☀⌀㌀㘀㌀ 䜀爀愀渀琀栀 䬀漀猀栀㰀⼀椀㸀Ⰰ 漀爀椀最椀渀愀氀氀礀 瀀甀戀氀椀猀栀攀搀 椀渀 ㄀㠀㤀㠀⸀ 吀栀攀 爀攀瘀椀猀攀搀 瘀攀爀猀椀漀渀Ⰰ 瀀甀戀氀椀猀栀攀搀 椀渀 ㄀㤀㈀㜀Ⰰ 最愀瘀攀 攀瘀椀搀攀渀挀攀 漀昀 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀✀猀 挀漀洀洀愀渀搀 漀昀 琀栀攀 猀挀椀攀渀挀攀 漀昀 攀琀礀洀漀氀漀最礀 愀渀搀 漀昀 琀栀攀 挀氀愀猀猀椀挀愀氀 愀渀搀 洀漀搀攀爀渀 氀愀渀最甀愀最攀猀⸀ 䠀攀 瀀甀戀氀椀猀栀攀搀 挀爀椀琀椀挀愀氀 攀搀椀琀椀漀渀猀 漀昀 猀漀洀攀 漀昀 琀栀攀 漀氀搀 匀椀欀栀 琀攀砀琀猀 猀甀挀栀 愀猀 㰀椀㸀匀椀欀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀 搀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 䈀栀愀最愀琀 䴀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀氀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀㰀⼀椀㸀 ⠀㄀㤀㄀㈀⤀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀倀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀挀栀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀渀 倀愀渀琀栀 倀爀愀欀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀猀栀㰀⼀椀㸀 ⠀㄀㤀㄀㐀⤀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀倀甀爀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀琀愀渀 䨀愀渀愀洀 匀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀欀栀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀㰀⼀椀㸀 ⠀㄀㤀㈀㘀⤀ 愀渀搀 㰀椀㸀匀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀欀栀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 倀漀琀栀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀㰀⼀椀㸀 ⠀㄀㤀㔀 ⤀⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ

        Monumental in size and scholarship was his annotation of Bhāī Santokh Siṅgh's magnum opus, Srī Gur Pratāp Sūraj Granth, published from 1927 to 1935 in fourteen volumes covering 6668 pages.

਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀☀渀戀猀瀀㬀一漀 猀漀漀渀攀爀 眀愀猀 琀栀攀 㰀椀㸀匀爀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 䜀甀爀 倀爀愀琀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀瀀 匀☀⌀㌀㘀㌀爀愀樀 䜀爀愀渀琀栀㰀⼀椀㸀 挀漀洀瀀氀攀琀攀搀 琀栀愀渀 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 氀愀甀渀挀栀攀搀 漀渀 愀渀 攀瘀攀渀 洀漀爀攀 愀爀搀甀漀甀猀 琀愀猀欀⸀ 吀栀椀猀 眀愀猀 愀 搀攀琀愀椀氀攀搀 挀漀洀洀攀渀琀愀爀礀 漀渀 琀栀攀 䜀甀爀☀⌀㌀㘀㌀ 䜀爀愀渀琀栀 匀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀栀椀戀⸀ 䤀渀 愀 眀愀礀Ⰰ 攀砀攀最攀猀椀猀 栀愀搀 戀攀攀渀 栀椀猀 氀椀昀攀氀漀渀最 漀挀挀甀瀀愀琀椀漀渀⸀ 䔀愀爀氀礀 椀渀 栀椀猀 挀愀爀攀攀爀 栀攀 栀愀搀 愀渀渀漀琀愀琀攀搀 猀攀氀攀挀琀椀漀渀猀 昀爀漀洀 琀栀攀 䠀漀氀礀 䈀漀漀欀 瀀甀戀氀椀猀栀攀搀 椀渀 ㄀㤀 㘀 甀渀搀攀爀 琀栀攀 琀椀琀氀攀 倀愀樀 䜀爀愀渀琀栀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 匀愀☀⌀㜀㜀㠀㤀椀欀Ⰰ 愀渀搀Ⰰ 愀猀 栀攀 栀椀洀猀攀氀昀 搀攀挀氀愀爀攀搀Ⰰ 愀氀氀 漀昀 栀椀猀 眀爀椀琀椀渀最 眀愀猀 愀渀 攀砀瀀漀猀椀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 匀椀欀栀 匀挀爀椀瀀琀甀爀攀⸀ 䠀攀 搀攀瘀漀琀攀搀 栀椀洀猀攀氀昀 甀渀猀瀀愀爀椀渀最氀礀 琀漀 琀栀攀 挀漀洀洀攀渀琀愀爀礀Ⰰ 戀甀琀 椀琀 爀攀洀愀椀渀攀搀 甀渀昀椀渀椀猀栀攀搀⸀ 䄀 氀椀昀攀琀椀洀攀 漀昀 甀渀爀攀氀椀攀瘀攀搀 栀愀爀搀 眀漀爀欀 愀渀搀 琀栀攀 眀攀椀最栀琀 漀昀 愀搀瘀愀渀挀椀渀最 礀攀愀爀猀 愀琀 氀愀猀琀 戀攀最愀渀 琀漀 琀攀氀氀⸀ 䤀渀 攀愀爀氀礀 ㄀㤀㔀㜀 猀椀最渀猀 漀昀 昀愀琀椀最甀攀 愀渀搀 眀攀愀欀渀攀猀猀 愀瀀瀀攀愀爀攀搀⸀ 䠀攀 眀愀猀 琀愀欀攀渀 椀氀氀 眀椀琀栀 愀 昀攀瘀攀爀 愀渀搀 搀椀攀搀 椀渀 栀椀猀 栀漀洀攀 椀渀 䄀洀爀椀琀猀愀爀 漀渀 ㄀  䨀甀渀攀 ㄀㤀㔀㜀⸀ 吀栀攀 瀀漀爀琀椀漀渀 漀昀 琀栀攀 挀漀洀洀攀渀琀愀爀礀ⴀⴀ渀攀愀爀氀礀 漀渀攀 栀愀氀昀 漀昀 琀栀攀 䠀漀氀礀 䈀漀漀欀ⴀⴀ栀攀 栀愀搀 挀漀洀瀀氀攀琀攀搀 眀愀猀 瀀甀戀氀椀猀栀攀搀 瀀漀猀琀栀甀洀漀甀猀氀礀 椀渀 猀攀瘀攀渀 氀愀爀最攀 瘀漀氀甀洀攀猀⸀㰀⼀瀀㸀ഀഀ ਍㰀瀀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䈀䤀䈀∀㸀ഀഀ BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Talib, Gurbachan Singh and Attar Singh, ed., Bhai Vir Siṅgh : Life, Times and Works. Chandigarh, 1973
    ਍㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 䠀愀爀戀愀渀猀 匀椀渀最栀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀䈀栀愀椀 嘀椀爀 匀椀渀最栀㰀⼀椀㸀⸀ 䐀攀氀栀椀Ⰰ ㄀㤀㜀㈀㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ
  2. Harbans Singh and Talib, Gurbachan Singh, Bhai Vir Singh : Poet of the Sikhs.
    ਍㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 䠀愀爀戀愀渀猀 匀椀渀最栀Ⰰ 攀搀⸀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀䈀栀愀椀 嘀椀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 䌀漀洀洀攀洀漀爀愀琀椀漀渀 嘀漀氀甀洀攀㰀⼀椀㸀⸀ 䐀攀氀栀椀Ⰰ ㄀㤀㔀㐀㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ
  3. Guleria, J.S., Bhai Vir Siṅgh : A Literary Portrait. Delhi, 1985
    ਍㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 倀愀爀欀愀猀栀 匀椀渀最栀 㰀椀㸀䌀漀渀琀椀渀甀椀渀最 䤀渀昀氀甀攀渀挀攀 漀昀 䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀㰀⼀椀㸀⸀ 䄀洀爀椀琀猀愀爀Ⰰ ㄀㤀㜀㈀㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ
  4. Satinder Siṅgh, Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh : Jīvan te Rachnā. Patiala, 1982
    ਍㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 匀攀欀栀漀渀Ⰰ 匀愀渀琀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 琀攀 唀渀栀愀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀 搀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀 夀甀最㰀⼀椀㸀⸀ 䰀甀搀栀椀愀渀愀Ⰰ ㄀㤀㘀㈀㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ
  5. Manmohan Siṅgh, Bhāī Vīr Siṅgh--Kavi dā Darshnik Vishleshaṇ. Delhi, 1975
    ਍㰀氀椀 挀氀愀猀猀㴀∀䌀㄀∀㸀 䐀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀瀀Ⰰ 䐀愀氀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀瀀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀Ⰰ 㰀椀㸀䈀栀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀 嘀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀爀 匀椀☀⌀㜀㜀㐀㤀最栀 㨀 䨀☀⌀㈀㤀㤀瘀愀渀 琀攀 䬀☀⌀㈀㔀㜀瘀椀 䌀栀椀渀琀愀渀㰀⼀椀㸀⸀ 䰀甀搀栀椀愀渀愀Ⰰ ㄀㤀㜀㐀㰀䈀刀㸀ഀഀ

Attar Siṅgh


਍㰀⼀昀漀渀琀㸀ഀഀ ਍㰀⼀䠀吀䴀䰀㸀㰀⼀䈀伀䐀夀㸀ഀഀ